We Can ALL Do It!
Equal rights for women is not just a women’s issue
Men: imagine being kidnapped and prostituted into one of America’s largest sex-trafficking businesses because you have blue eyes. Or working 60 hours a week and getting paid $2.00 per hour less than somebody who works 40 hours a week, strictly because you have blonde hair.
It may be hard to comprehend, but this is the reality for too many women today.
Dress codes in high school are more strongly enforced on the female population than males. Across America, middle and high school-aged girls are getting sent home for ‘inappropriate’ clothing, so their male counterparts do not get distracted. Since when is taking away a girl’s ability to express herself beneficial to a boy’s education?
High school dress codes single females out and promotes the notion that a woman’s appearance is solely a distraction for males and only that. Adolescent females are missing out on formal education due to the fact that they are being sexualized in a “safe” school setting.
Men, the next time a girlfriend, sister, mother, woman in your life complains about a problem like this, hear them out. Understand this is an issue that needs to be resolved, and it starts with you.
Unfortunately, these problems don’t end after high school, in fact in many ways they get worse.
Despite years of protest and changes in laws and attitudes, working women still earn less than men. In 2015, female full-time, year-round workers made only 80 cents for every dollar earned by men, a gender wage gap of 20 percent. In Pennsylvania, the median annual earnings for full-time, year-round workers, ages 16 or older, for males was $50,412. For women, the average was only $39,905. The earnings ratio between the two was 79%.
As a rule, earnings rise as years of education increase for both women and men. However, while more education is a useful tool for increasing earnings, it is NOT an effective shield against the gender pay gap. The pay gap is even worse for women of color. Is it because of the careers women are picking? Or is it because women have never been considered equal to the male population? Have they ever been to superior to men? No.
Discrimination also extends to the retail marketplace. Women pay more for everyday household and sanitary items than men, including things like deodorant, socks, shampoo, shaving cream, perfume, soap, razors, lotions, and other necessities for proper hygiene.
Is this only because these companies are trying to make a profit? Or are these companies profiting from the higher hygiene standard women are held to? This is called “Women’s Tax,” or even the “Pink Tax.” Many believe this to be a myth, but the facts speak for themselves.
Men, the next time a girlfriend/sister/mother/woman in your life complains about a problem like this, hear them out. Understand this is an issue that needs to be resolved, and it starts with you.
My name is Rayne and I'm a senior at TAHS. This is my first, and last, year being a part of the Eagle Eye staff. After I graduate, I plan on attending...
beverly • Nov 7, 2017 at 2:49 pm
and there just opinions that’s all they are rayne
beverly • Nov 7, 2017 at 7:47 am
and rayne you are a senior, last year 4 you and me, 4 all of the seniors okay
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 3:14 pm
hey think about this, everything that you guys arguing about is an old fight 3 words women’s rights movement
Lily Williams • Oct 31, 2017 at 5:55 pm
Hi Rayne!
Before I respond to your article, I just want to take a moment to say: Great job! It is absolutely wonderful that you started a dialogue about such an important social issue that has infiltrated every culture, everywhere. The first step in changing a culture that is traditionally quite stubborn is to simply begin a conversation. Conversation will lead to direct action.
Regarding the comments that you have received, both good and bad, keep in mind: it is part of the dialogue that you facilitated, which is a big deal! Discussion helps to denormalize certain behaviors, cultural tendencies, and stereotypes that some people may never have realized were abnormal to begin with. Anyways, I would like to briefly go over something. A lot of the comments that I have read with classic argument structure have used what is known as a logical fallacy, more specifically, an “ad hominem” fallacy. This basically means that the opponent is attacking the person, instead of the argument itself. Even more specifically, I noticed an “ad hominem circumstantial” fallacy pop up. This simply means that the opponent will try to discredit your argument about equal rights for women, simply because you are a woman. Do not respond to these with anything but maturity. Remember, dialogue is important!
With this in mind, I would like to suggest something for your article. When you attack the male population, you are giving them leeway to become defensive. When you argue that way, you yourself are committing an ad hominem fallacy. Shy away from this, because there is a much better way! With an issue as sensitive and deeply rooted as this one, it is in your best interest to use a “Rogerian” argument form. This type of argument seeks to find a common ground with the opposite side, which builds a bridge to a better conversation. A classic example of this is Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail” in which King was in a jail cell with no food, water, or light for several days. He penned a compassionate letter to a group of clergymen who were criticizing his activism for ignorant reasons. Think about that for a second. He was sitting… in a jail cell… unsure of whether he would ever see the light of day again… and started out his letter by saying “My Dear Fellow Clergymen”. Unbelievable. If King could do that, so can you!
Anyways, I am not sure what you are doing after you graduate, but I can offer my insight from my field of study. I am a biochemistry, pre medicine student, who is looking to attend medical school. Many think that social issues are dramatized, and simply need more concrete evidence to solidify in their eyes that a problem exists. From a science nerd standpoint, I have some interesting articles that I would like to share with you. Sexism exists not only in medicine, but in chemistry as well. Take a moment to read these. You will be shocked!
I will leave you with these. Here are the links!
Best,
Lily
his activism in
Lily Williams • Oct 31, 2017 at 5:56 pm
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/10/04/this-is-the-kind-of-sexism-women-who-want-to-be-doctors-deal-with-in-med-school/?utm_term=.64e04fc28c4d
https://www.wired.com/story/why-men-dont-believe-the-data-on-gender-bias-in-science/
https://www.salon.com/2014/02/20/sexism_plagues_major_chemistry_conference_boycott_emerges_amid_growing_outrage/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/04/30/sexism-in-science-peer-editor-tells-female-researchers-their-study-needs-a-male-author/?utm_term=.37bc6aafc094
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 2:42 pm
good
Devon Henninger • Oct 30, 2017 at 12:58 pm
Feminism used to stand for “equality”, until the third wave of feminism came into the limelight. That is what we have now, where more than anything they want a matriarchy. Where they are able to get exactly what they want, no matter the circumstances. Feminism in the days of the suffragettes was very justifiable. They didn’t have equal rights, but now, I’d love for a legitimate source that shows how women are discriminated against. When I say legitimate I don’t mean Buzzfeed.
☭Dale☭ • Oct 31, 2017 at 12:48 pm
Well said m8.
Gina Gavazzi • Oct 31, 2017 at 4:12 pm
As far as your views on feminism, just remember that there isn’t just one type: intersectional, individualist, cultural and many more. Not everyone expresses their beliefs in the same way, but the heart of feminism is equality.
If you want a legitimate source on discrimination against women, ask the women in your life. Chances are that so many more women have been subject to sexual harassment than you even realize. Take a look at the “Me Too” movement happening right now. These issues are way more widespread than many people realize. The good news is that more and more women are finding the strength to speak out and shed light on discrimination against women.
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 2:49 pm
what
rayne • Oct 30, 2017 at 11:05 am
fem·i·nism
ˈ/feməˌnizəm/
noun:
the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 2:48 pm
rayne ignore all of the haters what you think how you did on the story that matters not them. ( listen to the good comments not the bad comments) okay rayne that what gives them power. you ignore them you will weaken them do the opposite you know what would happen.
colin • Oct 30, 2017 at 8:27 am
Good job rayne!!!
Connor Gority • Oct 28, 2017 at 11:58 am
I agree with what you’re saying for the most part. However, I think it’s funny when girls wear the things they do, then get upset when people (mostly guys) stare. You’re all kinda doing this to and for yourselves.
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 2:39 pm
explain
Gina Gavazzi • Oct 27, 2017 at 9:29 pm
Wow, reading some of these comments is unsettling. I think many people have missed the point of this article: that women face unique challenges in this world. Feminism isn’t about hating on men or ignoring men’s issues–most feminists even support issues like paternity leave for men. It’s about EQUALITY of the sexes. I think that an article about women’s issues is not trying to convince readers that men don’t face other challenges, it’s just not the focus here. But for those of you who feel passionately about men’s issues, write an article like Rayne did!
I’m a business student, so I’ll only speak about the pay gap in the business industry because that’s what I’m familiar with. Salaries are negotiated when a new employee is hired at a company, and lots of studies show that women tend to refrain from negotiating in these situations, which may be a big contributor to the pay gap (at least in the business world). I know it’s easy to say that these facts mean that the pay gap isn’t real and we should blame women for not fighting for more pay, but the real issue is deeper than pay for women. I feel that women don’t negotiate salary as often as men because of societal issues.
Hear me out. Women are already underrepresented in the business world, which makes it seem like there are less opportunities for us in the job market. That being said, women are more likely to take what they can get instead of negotiating salary based on how they value themselves and their education. Even more than this, women are conditioned to be submissive from a young age. Sexual violence against women is a huge issue in America, and girls are conditioned to “keep our heads down” from a young age for our safety.
Yes, I am well aware that men experience sexual harassment as well, but I’ve found that it’s not as engrained in their minds as it is for girls. If you ask any woman what they do on a daily basis to prevent being a victim of sexual violence, almost every one will have at least one answer. For me, I have a keychain that can be used as a weapon if needed, I always call someone when I’m walking home from work or class alone, and I never go downtown at night unless I’m in a group. Most of these things don’t even cross the minds of men because it just isn’t as much of an issue for them. In my experience, these societal issues in America can make women feel less powerful.
I think that these issues, and many more, contribute to societal factors and perceptions of women being inherently weak or incapable. So the pay gap is real, but I don’t see it as the main issue for women. Step one is building a society that empowers and instills confidence in women, and I believe that the rest will follow. I’m glad to see an article written about a relevant issue in today’s world. Good job Rayne!
Arian Hicks • Oct 26, 2017 at 1:12 pm
I know thats right.
Brandon E. • Oct 26, 2017 at 11:58 am
Can i just say how cliche this all is? The minute a girl posts something about “feminism”, about fairness or really anything that hints towards the idea of equality she is instantly attacked and judged(mainly by the male population) This is a great article. Rayne is simply speaking her mind and bringing an issue that she is evidently passionate about to the public. The problems that she has brought up are real, they don’t exist just in video games or tv. They don’t realize that these problems really happen.
It is so much easier to be judgmental, to be rude, to be hateful towards people who experience these problems and talk about it when you have never had to and never will have to face these issues.You don’t know how they feel and you don’t know how you are making Rayne feel, you’re just blowing smoke because you can. It’s really disgusting how you think that you are somehow above it all and that you have the right to tear someone down who has worked so hard to bring up a topic that she knows is going to have a huge backlash because you aren’t going to face any discrimination in your life.
I don’t really care if you’re annoyed by the fact that someone from a group that is still not being treated equally is speaking up. You should be proud of the fact that Rayne is being brave enough to show us how she feels, you should be building her up, NOT tearing her down.
Aden • Oct 26, 2017 at 2:47 pm
Feminism is NOT equality, if the article was about gender equality, then it would point out both the male AND female sides, and not point out things that have been proven wrong already (such as wage gap, which has plenty of resources showing that it’s not simply “women are paid less because they’re women”).
Taylor Laber • Oct 26, 2017 at 2:50 pm
imo, i don’t think building up someone who’s shown to be really biased in their article is the best way to go about it
if anything, no one’s really being that rude or anything. sure, brady was a bit smug but clearly he wanted a discussion, not a huge fight
yeah, rayne is being brave broadcasting her opinion, i’ll give it that, buuut…. everyone here should be able to accept that people view things very differently and people have different ways to broadcast them
clearly those who are being incredibly rude are those constantly insulting the author or person throughout, and from what i’ve seen, people haven’t been really doing that…. sooooo dunno if you truly know what you’re talking about
please don’t take what i said into offence. just offering another view
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 2:52 pm
that’s nice
Brady • Oct 26, 2017 at 5:47 pm
Fun fact: Did you know that “argument” is not the same thing as “attacking people” and “being hateful”?
Wow! Incredible!
“Because you aren’t going to face any discrimination in your life.”
And for my next trick, I’ll direct you to Dale’s comment. You must have missed it. It’s the first one in this entire comment section.
You’re welcome!
beverly • Oct 30, 2017 at 10:08 am
can you say anything positive at all about the article that the hard work that rayne did?
Taylor Laber • Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49 am
can you have a discussion and consider the other person’s point of view?
Logan P. • Oct 26, 2017 at 10:10 am
Good editorial Rayne 🙂
rayne • Oct 26, 2017 at 10:17 am
Thank you!!! Appreciate it 🙂
Taylor Laber • Oct 26, 2017 at 9:04 am
lets hope i don’t get lotsa flack for offering my opinion on this
personally, i don’t really think brady was being sexist at all. sure, he was smug, but he did have very valid points against this article. (and this is a female saying this, too)
i don’t want to say that sexism against females is non-existant, because we all know that isn’t true, but we have to acknowledge that it isn’t as bad as it’s made out to be anymore. women can vote, women are paid just as much as men (reasons to why women are ‘paid less’ than men is listed here if you don’t believe me: https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/05/09/men-and-women-choose-careers-differently/) and most importantly, women are actually being taken seriously. they’re not viewed as a joke, unless topics such as this come into play.
i understand people want things to be equal, but in my opinion, we already are at that point. we are equal, in terms of what we can do. we can literally do the same thing as men if we all so wanted to
sadly though, men slowly are being taken less seriously and if anything, they’re now starting to be viewed as lying idiots. this obviously isn’t true, because everyone is different, but as dale mentioned, men are often accused for raping females, despite the opposite sometimes being true, that women can rape men as well. people always just side with the ladies because “oh that poor lady!!! that poor female!!!!!!!!!” and they dehumanize the male within that statement(s)
since this article doesn’t really acknowledge the other side of current sexism, and only comes off as preaching feminism (tl;dr “woman have it harder than men!!!!”), i don’t think this article has been well-thought out imo
but of course. don’t listen to me, i am a lady after all who doesn’t know what they’re talking about and is probably sexist against their own gender ahahahahrfgds
tl;dr bad article and here’s my opinion on why
rayne • Oct 26, 2017 at 10:16 am
what
Taylor Laber • Oct 26, 2017 at 2:44 pm
thanks for replying to me stating literally nothing from your side to show you understand me and / or you’re willing to discuss with me
i mean, me too, thanks
Aden • Oct 25, 2017 at 2:43 pm
So, riddle me this. If we were truly paying women less *solely* because they’re women, why then doesn’t companies hire all women?
Travis Yazzie • Oct 25, 2017 at 8:50 am
quality meme right here. the comment section was by far the best part of the editorial.
Jake • Oct 25, 2017 at 8:19 am
As the old chant goes,
We are women!
We are free!
Let’s go end the patriarchy!
We are women!
Hear our shout!
We are women!
We have no doubt!
Alexis williams • Oct 24, 2017 at 6:32 pm
I agree that both Dale and Rayne each have solid arguments to stand on. It is unfortunate that people have made a joke out of this editorial instead of trying to understand what the writer is trying to convey.
beverly • Oct 24, 2017 at 2:45 pm
awesome story rayne two thumbs up
beverly • Oct 24, 2017 at 2:27 pm
wow how much spare time do you have Brady
Devin Phillips • Oct 24, 2017 at 12:58 pm
If anybody thinks that Brady is sexist your wrong because he is simply using facts that have sources to prove his point and come on we all know that the wage gap is a myth because if it was real men would not be employed because companies would save money by hiring women.
Zackery Webster • Oct 24, 2017 at 12:04 pm
I find it extremely odd that the closing point of the article was a call-to-action for men to listen to heartedly consider claims of discrimination. Meanwhile, the comments are riddled with ad-hominem remarks and general toxicity from men against those claims, specifically Brady. The thought process behind reading the last paragraph of the article, then writing a comment opening with “It seems that another rotten bundle of neo-feminist arguments has arrived on my doorstep.” Is bass-ackward to me. It seems like your only purpose is to rustle jimmies rather than have an actual debate about inequality. Your ad-hominem is showing and it’s ruining your platform.
If someone would like to argue, please take a note from Dale.
Brady • Oct 25, 2017 at 11:36 pm
“It seems that another rotten bundle of neo-feminist arguments has arrived on my doorstep.”
Rewritten simply (and much less funnily):
“The arguments in this article I find rotten and in line with neo-feminist ideals. I am once again going to argue against the arguments present.”
There is no mention of the author in this sentence that you’ve quoted, which is about the arguments. Inferring that the negative adjectives in the sentence are referring to the author would be foolish and unfounded. Therefore, this cannot be ad hominem.
Game over. Try again. [insert egomaniacal raving here]
The idea that one should NOT argue against points, but that he should listen and sit silently is ludicrous. I listened “heartedly” and “heard her out”. I then proceeded to argue against almost every point of hers, without forgetting to mention anything. I studied the article thoroughly and considered each individual point and my feelings on each. I believe I’ve done exactly what the call to action told me to, in fact. I simply disagree, and decided to voice my opinion, albeit in a smug way.
Also, I would like to point out that Dale was not arguing against the article, but adding a point about discussing both sides equally–a point that I agree with. I assume that you know this already, but I just thought I’d make sure that this was clear, because your statement almost makes it sound as if Dale himself is arguing against the article.
Free Brown • Oct 24, 2017 at 11:42 am
Will you smash the patriarchy?
Joe • Oct 25, 2017 at 8:07 am
How bout ‘er
Devon Henninger • Oct 24, 2017 at 8:24 am
Support the Patriarchy.
Caleb • Oct 23, 2017 at 5:04 pm
Overall, here is what I think of your essay in its entirety: Women: Imagine being forced to register for the draft in a time of war because you are an able-bodied male, receiving little pay for your service, possibly getting PTSD and becoming homeless. I’m not saying that men or women have it harder in the U.S. I just think that common hardships men have are (for the most part) avoided in the essay. Also, I don’t think it is a great idea to focus on women’s rights in the U.S. because they are pretty much equal to men. Try a region like Saudi Arabia, where women are forced to cover themselves entirely, they cannot drive, and they are wedged out of many many opportunities. And seriously, how could you argue against something like that?
“Dress codes in high school are more strongly enforced on the female population than males. Across America, middle and high school-aged girls are getting sent home for ‘inappropriate’ clothing, so their male counterparts do not get distracted. Since when is taking away a girl’s ability to express herself beneficial to a boy’s education?”
You literally just mentioned the reason that girls (guys too) are sent home. I understand that I can wear clothing that may distract you, so I abide by the dress code. I also understand that the dress code is different for male and female, but so are the only two genders are known to humankind.
I don’t mean to skip over other components of your essay, but otherwise, I would be practically paraphrasing Brady.
Eva • Oct 23, 2017 at 2:31 pm
I think it’s sad that when a female student posts an article showing the struggles some women face, they are then attacked by men telling them that their argument/opinion is invalid and a “rotten bundle of neo-feminist arguments.”
Aden • Oct 26, 2017 at 2:51 pm
It’s one thing to push for equal rights, but I’m not going to agree with and support an article that implies women are paid more than men just because they’re women, among other things. The article did not show anything to do with the struggles and disadvantages that men have in society. If I disagree with an ideal in an article (as I do in this case), I’m not going to sit around and support it.
Jacob Taylor • Oct 23, 2017 at 2:05 pm
Great editorial!
Brady • Oct 23, 2017 at 7:49 am
It seems that another rotten bundle of neo-feminist arguments has arrived on my doorstep.
There is nothing sexist about school dress codes. Would you like boys walking around in speedos shirtless during school? No? Good. Then your sanity is at least slightly intact. I apologize that there is more for girls to cover up, but I can’t reinvent human biology for you, and neither can anyone else. It’s not about creating a non-distracting environment for /boys/. It’s about creating a healthy, respectable and efficient learning environment for /everyone/. I thought this was obvious.
And are adolescent females really missing out on formal education because of dress codes? Source? Or do you mean the girls who are sent home early a few days of the year because they couldn’t be bothered to read the dress code? If so, then yeah, you’re right: they’re missing out on SO MUCH of their school year.
And don’t even bring up the earnings gap as if it’s a wage gap. That one’s been done too many times before. The only thing that the earnings gap shows is that the two genders choose their careers differently, which is also supported by scientific studies. That you use the earnings gap to imply that a wage gap exists shows that you are either very dishonest or that you don’t know what these terms mean.
Probably both, actually.
https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/05/09/men-and-women-choose-careers-differently/
I can’t find anything wrong with your points about women’s taxation, because I haven’t researched that topic and I only have about ten minutes here. Though, thank you for making my point about women’s items prices easier. What am I talking about? The very same article that /you/ linked us to in your article tells us that women’s products “smell different and look different but at the end of the day serve the same purpose as scent-less, glitter-less versions”. Logically, you should just buy the cheaper stuff, whether it says “men” or “women” on the box. Take a look at my pink polka-dot notebook and you will (hopefully by this point) understand that I buy whatever’s cheapest. I suggest you do the same.
If there is some special reason why you need to buy the women’s version of common items, please explain it to me.
I’ll link the very same article here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/learnvest/2012/05/15/the-woman-tax-how-gendered-pricing-costs-women-almost-1400-a-year/#60068be57e96
I also love how, at the beginning of the article, you use “this is the reality for women today” to imply that forced prostitution and low pay are simply parts of every single woman’s life. Nice.
Of course, I’m not saying that women have it better. I’m simply pointing out that your entire article is based on illogical conclusions and data misconceptions. The lack of any points in favor of men’s rights leads me to believe that you think that women have it worse than men do, and so I remind you that the grass is always greener on the other side. The man in this video makes some very good points, if you care to take a listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E9cU28rr_o
Or don’t. I’ve done my job.
Rayne • Oct 23, 2017 at 11:39 am
1. You twisted around a majority of the things I said.
2. My points, surprisingly, are proven to be valid through facts and stats, whether you want to admit it or not.
3. This article was not posted to preach feminism, but to inform the public of things that really aren’t talked about / make people uncomfortable.
But thanks for your input anyways(:
Caleb • Oct 23, 2017 at 5:34 pm
Can you give proof that he twisted around most of the things you said? For your own sake, it really hurts your argument to just say something without any facts to prove it.
Also, your facts are correct. However, they can mislead people like Brady said. Women choose lower paying jobs than men and therefore make less money. Seriously, imagine a company wanting to hire for the same job saying “Here let’s hire the women over the man because we will save money!” That is ludicrous. If the man or women have a better skillset for the job, let them have it.
Feminism: the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. From your essay: “Equal rights for women is not just a women’s issue” You are preaching feminism.
Brady • Oct 23, 2017 at 8:51 pm
1. Example, please?
2. I would be surprised as well if these points were supported by facts. Unfortunately, “facts and stats” is not synonymous with “my personal opinion”. You only ever speculated in your first point about the dress code, without providing any evidence that all or most dress codes in the US are sexist or enforced in a sexist way.
In your second point, you presented data (from an unknown source) about the earnings gap. You then went on to state that the earnings gap is worse for women of color (which is possible, but can be ignored without a citation), and to say that women being payed less for the same work is the /real/ reason why there is an earnings gap. Sure, statistics were included in your argument, but there was no real evidence for your point that females get paid less for the same work (I understand that you never actually said in that paragraph that women definitely get paid less, but consider that you /did/ say so in your introduction. It is also heavily implied by your tone).
And I’ve already stated that I don’t have any real arguments for your third point. In my original comment, I was simply pointing out that your choice of source for that particular point had a partial solution in it. Obviously, the tax is still something to be discussed.
3. Okay. Sorry for the assumption. However, I still have a problem if your essay is mostly persuasion and speculation but your purpose is “to inform the public”.
You’re welcome for the input.
beverly • Oct 24, 2017 at 2:43 pm
i got some facts for you okay.
1. the story that rayne did is very interesting to read
2. i think she did an awesome job on it
3. i know she tried to get all of the facts i would like to see you try to write one of these
4. the story is pretty good think before you type or say something because what you say can hurt people not cool
okay
beverly • Nov 6, 2017 at 3:08 pm
what you can’t say about smart one
Nick • Oct 26, 2017 at 8:31 am
I think both articles are great. But I want to ask where Brady stated that you were preaching Feminism, he said that you were a feminist and you had an argument. One other thing, “to inform the public of things that really aren’t talked about / make people uncomfortable.” You did indeed make people uncomfortable. But what you didn’t do is talk about things that are not already talked about. You cannot tell me or anybody else that the “pay gap” and anything else to do with women’s rights are not mentioned very often. Women’s rights is a HUGE topic in our society, and you’re saying that it’s not talked about. I think women’s rights is a huge deal. And just for the record, my Mother makes more money than my Father does.
christian • Oct 23, 2017 at 2:24 pm
Dude…. Thats messed up.
Dale • Oct 20, 2017 at 2:03 pm
I understand that woman have it bad. But I think this ignores the problems that men face. For example.
89% of men will be the victim of at least one violent crime.
Men are over twice as victimized by strangers as women.
Men are 165% more likely to be convicted than women.
Men get 63% longer sentences than women for the same crime.
Men are 97% of combat fatalities.
Men pay 97% of Alimony
Men make up 94% of work suicides.
Men make up 93% of work fatalities.
Men make up 81% of all war deaths.
Men lose custody in 84% of divorces.
80% of all suicides are men.
77% of homicide victims are men.
89% of men will be the victim of at least one violent crime.
Men are over twice as victimized by strangers as women.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/3335/dear-feminists-men-have-it-worse-all-areas-chase-stephens.
I am just saying, if equality is what we are aiming for, let’s look at the issues that men also face.
Rayne • Oct 23, 2017 at 11:40 am
You have a valid argument as well. Thank you!
Dale • Oct 23, 2017 at 1:36 pm
Thank you for the reply. 🙂